# Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs Muse Glimmer

> Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-thinking-turbo-vs-muse-glimmer
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher in 7 categories and Muse Glimmer in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 50.9 to 38.5.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 45.8 | 41.7 |
| Rank | 70 | 131 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178)
- Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1322 | 1355 |
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1416 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75)
- Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1428 | 1396 |
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |

## Math

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68)
- Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1429 | 1417 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69)
- Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | 1386 |
| GPQA Diamond | 84.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109)
- Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | 1390 |
| LMArena French | 1425 | — |
| LMArena German | 1390 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1357 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1330 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1406 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109)
- Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | 1375 |

## Long Context

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102)
- Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 1382 |

## Writing & Preference

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104)
- Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1415 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1374 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | 1399 |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better than Muse Glimmer?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 38.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and Muse Glimmer share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.