# Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs MiMo-V2-Pro

> Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 42.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-thinking-turbo-vs-mimo-v2-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher in 4 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 31.4 to 21.3.
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 45.4 | 42.4 |
| Rank | 63 | 102 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.1 (#166)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.4 (#76)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1322 | 1433 |
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1476 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 31.4 (#72)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 21.3 (#200)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1428 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |

## Math

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 45.5 (#62)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 36.7 (#104)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1429 | 1447 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#64)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 40.8 (#106)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | 1479 |
| GPQA Diamond | 84.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.6 (#104)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.9 (#77)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1457 | 1455 |
| LMArena French | 1425 | 1470 |
| LMArena German | 1390 | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1356 | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | 1329 | 1401 |
| LMArena Russian | 1390 | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1407 | 1458 |

## Instruction Following

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.2 (#103)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.2 (#46)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | 1444 |

## Long Context

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#99)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#133)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |

## Writing & Preference

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.2 (#99)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.9 (#67)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1415 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1373 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | 1456 |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better than MiMo-V2-Pro?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 42.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 38.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and MiMo-V2-Pro share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.