# Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs MiMo-V2-Flash

> Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-thinking-turbo-vs-mimo-v2-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher in 8 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 50.9 to 39.1.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 45.4 | 40.8 |
| Rank | 63 | 137 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.1 (#166)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.8 (#205)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1322 | 1330 |
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1443 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 31.4 (#72)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.1 (#155)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1428 | 1420 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |

## Math

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 45.5 (#62)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.6 (#141)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1429 | 1396 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#64)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.1 (#126)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | 1425 |
| GPQA Diamond | 84.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.6 (#104)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.1 (#109)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 1391 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1457 | 1463 |
| LMArena French | 1425 | 1429 |
| LMArena German | 1390 | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1356 | 1324 |
| LMArena Korean | 1329 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1390 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1407 | 1420 |

## Instruction Following

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.2 (#103)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.7 (#115)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | 1392 |

## Long Context

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#99)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#106)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 1409 |

## Writing & Preference

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.2 (#99)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.9 (#101)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1415 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1373 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | 1404 |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.