# Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 45.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-thinking-turbo-vs-mimo-v2-6-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher in 3 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 5 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 53.2 to 38.1.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 45.4 | 46.7 |
| Rank | 63 | 55 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.1 (#166)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1322 | 1618 |
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1538 |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 31.4 (#72)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1428 | 1511 |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |

## Math

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 45.5 (#62)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1429 | 1497 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#64)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | 1548 |
| GPQA Diamond | 84.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1265 |

## Multilingual

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.6 (#104)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1457 | 1532 |
| LMArena Russian | 1390 | 1481 |
| LMArena French | 1425 | — |
| LMArena German | 1390 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1356 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1329 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1407 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.2 (#103)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | 1490 |

## Long Context

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#99)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 1500 |

## Writing & Preference

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.2 (#99)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1415 | 1491 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1373 | 1465 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | 1463 |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 45.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.2 versus 38.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14.