# Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs MiMo-V2.5

> Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-thinking-turbo-vs-mimo-v2-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher in 3 categories and MiMo-V2.5 in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 50.9 to 40.2.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 45.4 | 43.0 |
| Rank | 63 | 89 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.1 (#166)
- MiMo-V2.5: 43.6 (#75)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1322 | 1438 |
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1469 |
| SciCode | — | 43.1% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 513.95 |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 31.4 (#72)
- MiMo-V2.5: 27.8 (#98)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1428 | 1450 |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |

## Math

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 45.5 (#62)
- MiMo-V2.5: 35.4 (#145)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1429 | 1436 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.1% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#64)
- MiMo-V2.5: 40.2 (#109)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | 1459 |
| GPQA Diamond | 84.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: —
- MiMo-V2.5: 39.0 (#53)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1245 |

## Multilingual

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.6 (#104)
- MiMo-V2.5: 52.0 (#96)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1457 | 1467 |
| LMArena French | 1425 | 1447 |
| LMArena German | 1390 | 1421 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1356 | 1304 |
| LMArena Korean | 1329 | 1363 |
| LMArena Russian | 1390 | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1407 | 1412 |

## Instruction Following

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.2 (#103)
- MiMo-V2.5: 75.7 (#55)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | 1433 |

## Long Context

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#99)
- MiMo-V2.5: 44.1 (#69)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 1444 |

## Writing & Preference

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.2 (#99)
- MiMo-V2.5: 61.8 (#82)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1415 | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1373 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | 1445 |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better than MiMo-V2.5?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 38.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and MiMo-V2.5 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.