# Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

> Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and MiMo-V2.5-Pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (45.8 vs 45.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-thinking-turbo-vs-mimo-v2-5-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher in 3 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 5 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 47.4 to 38.4.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 45.8 | 45.2 |
| Rank | 70 | 74 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1322 | 1479 |
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1503 |
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 899.8 |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1428 | 1488 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 34.4% |
| CritPt | — | 4% |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| DTBench | — | 84.5% |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |

## Math

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1429 | 1481 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.1% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 22% |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | 1503 |
| GPQA Diamond | 84.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 1449 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | 1507 |
| LMArena French | 1425 | 1488 |
| LMArena German | 1390 | 1458 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1357 | 1412 |
| LMArena Korean | 1330 | 1437 |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | 1450 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1406 | 1471 |

## Instruction Following

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | 1477 |

## Long Context

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 1483 |

## Writing & Preference

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1415 | 1465 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1374 | 1440 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | 1477 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1493 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1208 |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and MiMo-V2.5-Pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (45.8 vs 45.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 38.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.