# Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs Llama 2-7B

> Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-thinking-turbo-vs-llama-2-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 60.0 to 28.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 20% for Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and 0% for Llama 2-7B.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 45.8 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 70 | 317 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178)
- Llama 2-7B: 29.2 (#307)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1002 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1322 | — |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75)
- Llama 2-7B: 15.7 (#312)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1428 | 1009 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 39.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 99.06 |
| HellaSwag | — | 77.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 73.3% |
| PIQA | — | 78.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 69.2% |

## Math

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68)
- Llama 2-7B: 30.7 (#233)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1429 | 1042 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.1% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 16.7% |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69)
- Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#248)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | 1036 |
| GPQA Diamond | 84.2% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 45.9% |
| BoolQ | — | 77.9% |
| MMLU | — | 45.8% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 58.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.7% |

## Multimodal

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: —
- Llama 2-7B: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.1% |

## Multilingual

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109)
- Llama 2-7B: 23.8 (#293)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 973 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | 973 |
| LMArena French | 1425 | 970 |
| LMArena German | 1390 | 978 |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | 995 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1406 | 1007 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1357 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1330 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109)
- Llama 2-7B: 50.8 (#298)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | 1006 |

## Long Context

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102)
- Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#287)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 999 |

## Writing & Preference

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104)
- Llama 2-7B: 28.0 (#298)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1415 | 1053 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1374 | 1033 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | 1029 |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better than Llama 2-7B?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo or Llama 2-7B better for coding?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and Llama 2-7B share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-7B has 29.