# Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs Llama 2-70B

> Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-thinking-turbo-vs-llama-2-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 50.9 to 7.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 83.1% for Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and 0% for Llama 2-70B.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 45.8 | 24.4 |
| Rank | 70 | 349 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178)
- Llama 2-70B: 31.4 (#286)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1079 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1322 | — |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75)
- Llama 2-70B: 14.4 (#325)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1428 | 1073 |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| DTBench | — | 41.6% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 64.9% |
| CommonsenseQA 2.0 | — | 50% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.79 |
| ForecastBench | — | 51.4 |
| HellaSwag | — | 85.3% |
| LAMBADA | — | 78.9% |
| PIQA | — | 82.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.2% |

## Math

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68)
- Llama 2-70B: 8.1 (#326)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.1% | 0% |
| LMArena Math | 1429 | 1091 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 3.3% |
| GSM8K | — | 69.6% |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69)
- Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#310)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 84.2% | 26.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | 1039 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 88.6% |
| MMLU | — | 69.9% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 60.2% |
| TriviaQA | — | 87.6% |

## Multilingual

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109)
- Llama 2-70B: 27.7 (#274)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 1045 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | 995 |
| LMArena French | 1425 | 1090 |
| LMArena German | 1390 | 1041 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1357 | 927 |
| LMArena Korean | 1330 | 964 |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | 1083 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1406 | 1143 |

## Instruction Following

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109)
- Llama 2-70B: 54.9 (#278)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | 1071 |

## Long Context

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102)
- Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#270)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 1062 |

## Writing & Preference

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104)
- Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#279)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1415 | 1115 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1374 | 1075 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | 1088 |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better than Llama 2-70B?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo or Llama 2-70B better for coding?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and Llama 2-70B share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-70B has 35.