# Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs Llama 13b

> Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-thinking-turbo-vs-llama-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 13b in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 60.0 to 13.8.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 45.8 | 24.4 |
| Rank | 70 | 348 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178)
- Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 683 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1322 | — |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75)
- Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1428 | 728 |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 100.58 |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |

## Math

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68)
- Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1429 | 838 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.1% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 84.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| MMLU | — | 47.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |

## Multimodal

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: —
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |

## Multilingual

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109)
- Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 819 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | — |
| LMArena French | 1425 | — |
| LMArena German | 1390 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1357 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1330 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1406 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109)
- Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | 781 |

## Long Context

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104)
- Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1415 | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1374 | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | 753 |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better than Llama 13b?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo or Llama 13b better for coding?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and Llama 13b share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.