# Kimi K2.7 Code vs Wizardlm 13b

> Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-7-code-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 52.6 to 27.8.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2.7 Code | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 90 | 272 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.95 | — |
| Output $/M | $4 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.4 (#92)
- Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 30.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 30.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1473 | — |
| SciCode | 47.5% | — |
| WeirdML | 54.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1035 |
| ALE-Bench | 886.23 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 23.9 (#115)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 37.6% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.9% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,083 | — |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 38.2 (#56)
- Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 57.9% | — |
| CritPt | 10% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1018 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 48.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.01 | — |

## Math

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.6 (#39)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 54% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 12.2% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1017 |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.6 (#51)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.9% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 36.5% | — |

## Multilingual

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1023 |

## Instruction Following

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1049 |

## Long Context

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1054 |

## Writing & Preference

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1047 |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than Wizardlm 13b?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Kimi K2.7 Code or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.7 Code and Wizardlm 13b share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.7 Code has 19 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.