# Kimi K2.7 Code vs Qwen3 Coder Next

> Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 5.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2.7 Code's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-7-code-vs-qwen3-coder-next
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3 Coder Next in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 38.2 to 21.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 54.1% for Kimi K2.7 Code and 34.4% for Qwen3 Coder Next.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $0.95 / $4 for Kimi K2.7 Code.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 33.8 |
| Rank | 90 | 229 |
| Context | 262K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.95 | $0.12 |
| Output $/M | $4 | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.4 (#92)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 35.8 (#206)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 47.5% | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | 54.1% | 34.4% |
| DeepSWE | 30.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 30.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1473 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 886.23 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 23.9 (#115)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 37.6% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.9% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,083 | — |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 38.2 (#56)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 21.7 (#191)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 10% | 0% |
| SimpleBench | 57.9% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 48.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.01 | — |

## Math

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.6 (#39)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 54% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 12.2% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.6 (#51)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.9% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 36.5% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 5.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2.7 Code's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.7 Code or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.7 Code lists at $0.95 and $4.

### Is Kimi K2.7 Code or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.7 Code and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.7 Code has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.