# Kimi K2.7 Code vs Qwen3.7 Plus

> Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 43.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-7-code-vs-qwen3-7-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 42.9 to 36.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierCode: 30.1% for Kimi K2.7 Code and 10.2% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.95 / $4 for Kimi K2.7 Code.
- Qwen3.7 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- Kimi K2.7 Code has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.3 | 45.3 |
| Rank | 94 | 72 |
| Context | 262K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.95 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $4 | $1.60 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | 30.1% | 10.2% |
| SciCode | 47.5% | 45.5% |
| DeepSWE | 30.5% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1473 | — |
| WeirdML | 54.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1473 |
| ALE-Bench | 886.23 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 37.6% | — |
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |
| GBAEval | 0.9% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,083 | — |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 10% | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | 24% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 149.97 | 147.37 |
| SimpleBench | 57.9% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1460 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 48.8% | — |

## Math

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 54% | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | 93.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 12.2% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1466 |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.9% | 87.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 36.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1467 |

## Multimodal

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1510 |
| LMArena French | — | 1473 |
| LMArena German | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1457 |

## Instruction Following

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1440 |

## Long Context

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1455 |

## Writing & Preference

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1460 |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 43.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.7 Code or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.7 Code lists at $0.95 and $4.

### Is Kimi K2.7 Code or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.7 Code and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.7 Code has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.