# Kimi K2.7 Code vs Qwen3.7 Flash

> Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 31× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2.7 Code's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-7-code-vs-qwen3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 5

## Summary

- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 52.9 to 38.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 54% for Kimi K2.7 Code and 19.3% for Qwen3.7 Flash.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.95 / $4 for Kimi K2.7 Code.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- Kimi K2.7 Code has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.3 | 39.9 |
| Rank | 94 | 156 |
| Context | 262K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.95 | $0.03 |
| Output $/M | $4 | $0.13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 30.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 30.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1473 | — |
| SciCode | 47.5% | — |
| WeirdML | 54.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 886.23 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 37.6% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.9% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,083 | — |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | 23% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 149.97 | 144.64 |
| SimpleBench | 57.9% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| CritPt | 10% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 48.8% | — |

## Math

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 54% | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | 86.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 12.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.9% | 82.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 36.5% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 31× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2.7 Code's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.7 Code or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.7 Code lists at $0.95 and $4.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.7 Code and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.7 Code has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.