# Kimi K2.7 Code vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

> Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 43.3 on the Noometry Index. Kimi K2.7 Code costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.6 Max Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-7-code-vs-qwen3-6-max-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Max Preview in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads 48.7 to 42.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SimpleQA Verified: 36.5% for Kimi K2.7 Code and 52% for Qwen3.6 Max Preview.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is cheaper at $0.95 / $4 per million input/output tokens, against $1.30 / $7.80 for Qwen3.6 Max Preview.
- Kimi K2.7 Code has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.3 | 51.5 |
| Rank | 94 | 43 |
| Context | 262K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.95 | $1.30 |
| Output $/M | $4 | $7.80 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.7 (#54)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1473 | 1482 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 76.7% |
| DeepSWE | 30.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 30.1% | — |
| SciCode | 47.5% | — |
| WeirdML | 54.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1471 |
| ALE-Bench | 886.23 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,083 | 4,254 |
| APEX-Agents | 37.6% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 41.7 (#53)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 57.9% | 63% |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | 20% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 149.97 | 149.24 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.1% |
| CritPt | 10% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1457 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 19% |
| DTBench | — | 87.2% |
| LMCA | — | 42.5% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 48.8% | — |

## Math

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.1 (#46)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | 91.1% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 54% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 12.2% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1465 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 23.1% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 4.2% |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#39)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.9% | 87.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 36.5% | 52% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1478 |

## Multilingual

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.2 (#48)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1437 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1487 |
| LMArena French | — | 1449 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1445 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1454 |

## Instruction Following

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.7 (#55)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1438 |

## Long Context

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#61)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1457 |

## Writing & Preference

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 63.8 (#60)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1447 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1435 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1456 |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 43.3 on the Noometry Index. Kimi K2.7 Code costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.6 Max Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.7 Code or Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Kimi K2.7 Code is cheaper. It lists at $0.95 per million input tokens and $4 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 Max Preview lists at $1.30 and $7.80.

### Is Kimi K2.7 Code or Qwen3.6 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.7 versus 42.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.7 Code and Qwen3.6 Max Preview share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.7 Code has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29.