# Kimi K2.7 Code vs Qwen3.6 Flash

> Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.6 Flash costs 4.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2.7 Code's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-7-code-vs-qwen3-6-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.6 Flash in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 52.6 to 38.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 54% for Kimi K2.7 Code and 22.5% for Qwen3.6 Flash.
- Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper at $0.19 / $1.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.95 / $4 for Kimi K2.7 Code.
- Qwen3.6 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- Kimi K2.7 Code has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 38.4 |
| Rank | 90 | 176 |
| Context | 262K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.95 | $0.19 |
| Output $/M | $4 | $1.13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.4 (#92)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ALE-Bench | 886.23 | 326.4 |
| DeepSWE | 30.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 30.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1473 | — |
| SciCode | 47.5% | — |
| WeirdML | 54.1% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 23.9 (#115)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 37.6% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.9% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,083 | — |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 38.2 (#56)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 28.4 (#90)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 57.9% | 35.2% |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | 20% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.01 | 143.26 |
| CritPt | 10% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 77.1% |
| LMCA | — | 31% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 48.8% | — |

## Math

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.6 (#39)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 38.0 (#88)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 54% | 22.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | 84.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 12.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 10.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.6 (#51)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.2 (#90)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.9% | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 36.5% | 15.9% |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than Qwen3.6 Flash?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.6 Flash costs 4.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2.7 Code's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.7 Code or Qwen3.6 Flash?

Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.19 per million input tokens and $1.13 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.7 Code lists at $0.95 and $4.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.6 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.7 Code and Qwen3.6 Flash share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.7 Code has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.