# Kimi K2.7 Code vs Qwen Turbo

> Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 20× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2.7 Code's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-7-code-vs-qwen-turbo
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen Turbo in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 52.9 to 15.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 95.6% for Kimi K2.7 Code and 6.1% for Qwen Turbo.
- Qwen Turbo is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.95 / $4 for Kimi K2.7 Code.
- Qwen Turbo accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- Kimi K2.7 Code has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.3 | 27.1 |
| Rank | 94 | 335 |
| Context | 262K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.95 | $0.05 |
| Output $/M | $4 | $0.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)
- Qwen Turbo: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 30.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 30.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1473 | — |
| SciCode | 47.5% | — |
| WeirdML | 54.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 886.23 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)
- Qwen Turbo: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 37.6% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.9% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,083 | — |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)
- Qwen Turbo: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 57.9% | — |
| CritPt | 10% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 48.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 149.97 | — |

## Math

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)
- Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | 6.1% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 54% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 12.2% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)
- Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.9% | 41.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 36.5% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than Qwen Turbo?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 20× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2.7 Code's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.7 Code or Qwen Turbo?

Qwen Turbo is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.7 Code lists at $0.95 and $4.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen Turbo does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.7 Code and Qwen Turbo share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.7 Code has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.