# Kimi K2.7 Code vs o1

> Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 40.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-7-code-vs-o1
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher in 3 categories and o1 in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 52.9 to 36.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 54% for Kimi K2.7 Code and 14.7% for o1.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is cheaper at $0.95 / $4 per million input/output tokens, against $15 / $60 for o1.
- Kimi K2.7 Code accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 200K.
- Kimi K2.7 Code has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2.7 Code | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 43.3 | 40.9 |
| Rank | 94 | 143 |
| Context | 262K | 200K |
| Input $/M | $0.95 | $15 |
| Output $/M | $4 | $60 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)
- o1: 46.1 (#70)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 54.1% | 47.6% |
| DeepSWE | 30.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 30.1% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 61.7% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1473 | — |
| SciCode | 47.5% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 69.7% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1367 |
| CadEval | — | 56% |
| ALE-Bench | 886.23 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 89% |
| MBPP+ | — | 80.2% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)
- o1: 24.6 (#117)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 37.6% | — |
| Cybench | — | 10% |
| GBAEval | 0.9% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 51.1% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,083 | — |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)
- o1: 27.9 (#111)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 57.9% | 41.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 149.97 | 141.91 |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 30.7% |
| CritPt | 10% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 5.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 91.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1371 |
| DTBench | — | 74.7% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65.5% |
| LMCA | — | 22.3% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 48.8% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 75.7% |

## Math

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)
- o1: 36.1 (#175)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 54% | 14.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | 73.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 12.2% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 80.3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1388 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 94.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 9.3% |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)
- o1: 41.5 (#110)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.9% | 76.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 36.5% | 41.1% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8% |
| Confabulations | — | 11.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1361 |

## Multimodal

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- o1: 34.2 (#93)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1168 |
| GeoBench | — | 80% |
| VPCT | — | 37% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 41.4% |

## Multilingual

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- o1: 48.6 (#142)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1394 |
| LMArena French | — | 1344 |
| LMArena German | — | 1337 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1346 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1396 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1345 |

## Instruction Following

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- o1: 74.8 (#86)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.5% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1367 |

## Long Context

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- o1: 50.3 (#9)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1378 |

## Writing & Preference

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- o1: 55.6 (#144)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1348 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 70.2% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1369 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 65.4% |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than o1?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 40.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.7 Code or o1?

Kimi K2.7 Code is cheaper. It lists at $0.95 per million input tokens and $4 per million output tokens; o1 lists at $15 and $60.

### Is Kimi K2.7 Code or o1 better for coding?

o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.1 versus 42.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Kimi K2.7 Code does, with 262K tokens against 200K.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.7 Code and o1 share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.7 Code has 19 scored results on Noometry and o1 has 52.