# Kimi K2.7 Code vs Muse Glimmer

> Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-7-code-vs-muse-glimmer
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher in 4 categories and Muse Glimmer in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 52.6 to 36.1.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2.7 Code | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 90 | 128 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.95 | — |
| Output $/M | $4 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.4 (#92)
- Muse Glimmer: 38.7 (#157)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1473 | 1355 |
| DeepSWE | 30.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 30.1% | — |
| SciCode | 47.5% | — |
| WeirdML | 54.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1417 |
| ALE-Bench | 886.23 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 23.9 (#115)
- Muse Glimmer: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 37.6% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.9% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,083 | — |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 38.2 (#56)
- Muse Glimmer: 27.2 (#111)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 57.9% | — |
| CritPt | 10% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1395 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 48.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.01 | — |

## Math

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.6 (#39)
- Muse Glimmer: 36.1 (#128)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 54% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 12.2% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1419 |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.6 (#51)
- Muse Glimmer: 37.9 (#140)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.9% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 36.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1388 |

## Multilingual

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- Muse Glimmer: 50.6 (#117)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1393 |

## Instruction Following

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- Muse Glimmer: 72.7 (#134)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1374 |

## Long Context

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#124)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1381 |

## Writing & Preference

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- Muse Glimmer: 57.7 (#122)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1338 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1398 |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than Muse Glimmer?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Kimi K2.7 Code or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.7 Code and Muse Glimmer share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Kimi K2.7 Code has 19 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 13.