# Kimi K2.7 Code vs Ministral 3B

> Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 17× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2.7 Code's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-7-code-vs-ministral-3b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher in 3 categories and Ministral 3B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 53.5 to 10.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 87.9% for Kimi K2.7 Code and 25.3% for Ministral 3B.
- Ministral 3B is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.10 per million input/output tokens, against $0.95 / $4 for Kimi K2.7 Code.
- Kimi K2.7 Code accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2.7 Code | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 43.3 | 26.2 |
| Rank | 94 | 338 |
| Context | 262K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.95 | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | $4 | $0.10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)
- Ministral 3B: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 30.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 30.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1473 | — |
| SciCode | 47.5% | — |
| WeirdML | 54.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 886.23 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)
- Ministral 3B: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 37.6% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.9% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,083 | — |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)
- Ministral 3B: 18.4 (#282)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 149.97 | 118.1 |
| SimpleBench | 57.9% | — |
| CritPt | 10% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | — |
| DTBench | — | 51.7% |
| LMCA | — | 5.5% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 48.8% | — |

## Math

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)
- Ministral 3B: 26.6 (#258)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 54% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 12.2% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 14.4% |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)
- Ministral 3B: 10.4 (#302)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.9% | 25.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 36.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.3% |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than Ministral 3B?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 17× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2.7 Code's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.7 Code or Ministral 3B?

Ministral 3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.7 Code lists at $0.95 and $4.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Kimi K2.7 Code does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.7 Code and Ministral 3B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.7 Code has 19 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 3B has 6.