# Kimi K2.7 Code vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-7-code-vs-mimo-v2-6-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher in 3 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 52.6 to 37.9.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $0.95 / $4 for Kimi K2.7 Code.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 46.7 |
| Rank | 90 | 55 |
| Context | 262K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.95 | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | $4 | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.4 (#92)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1473 | 1618 |
| DeepSWE | 30.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 30.1% | — |
| SciCode | 47.5% | — |
| WeirdML | 54.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1538 |
| ALE-Bench | 886.23 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 23.9 (#115)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 37.6% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.9% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,083 | — |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 38.2 (#56)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 57.9% | — |
| CritPt | 10% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1511 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 48.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.01 | — |

## Math

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.6 (#39)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 54% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 12.2% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1497 |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.6 (#51)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.9% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 36.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1548 |

## Multimodal

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1265 |

## Multilingual

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1532 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1481 |

## Instruction Following

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1490 |

## Long Context

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1500 |

## Writing & Preference

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1491 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1465 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1463 |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.7 Code or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.7 Code lists at $0.95 and $4.

### Is Kimi K2.7 Code or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.2 versus 42.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.7 Code and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Kimi K2.7 Code has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14.