# Kimi K2.7 Code vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

> MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-7-code-vs-mimo-v2-6-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 52.6 to 37.4.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.95 / $4 for Kimi K2.7 Code.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 44.4 |
| Rank | 90 | 74 |
| Context | 262K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.95 | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | $4 | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.4 (#92)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 30.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 30.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1473 | — |
| SciCode | 47.5% | — |
| WeirdML | 54.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1516 |
| ALE-Bench | 886.23 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 23.9 (#115)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 37.6% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.9% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,083 | — |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 38.2 (#56)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 57.9% | — |
| CritPt | 10% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1481 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 48.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.01 | — |

## Math

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.6 (#39)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 54% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 12.2% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1477 |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.6 (#51)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.9% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 36.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1516 |

## Multimodal

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1266 |

## Multilingual

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1439 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1501 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1424 |

## Instruction Following

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1463 |

## Long Context

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1465 |

## Writing & Preference

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1459 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1408 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1460 |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.7 Code or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.7 Code lists at $0.95 and $4.

### Is Kimi K2.7 Code or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 42.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.7 Code and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.7 Code has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13.