# Kimi K2.7 Code vs Llama 3.2 90B

> Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-7-code-vs-llama-3-2-90b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher in 3 categories and Llama 3.2 90B in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 52.6 to 10.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 95.6% for Kimi K2.7 Code and 2.6% for Llama 3.2 90B.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2.7 Code | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 27.1 |
| Rank | 90 | 326 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.95 | — |
| Output $/M | $4 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.4 (#92)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 30.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 30.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1473 | — |
| SciCode | 47.5% | — |
| WeirdML | 54.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 886.23 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 23.9 (#115)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 37.6% | — |
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |
| GBAEval | 0.9% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,083 | — |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 38.2 (#56)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.01 | 125.5 |
| SimpleBench | 57.9% | — |
| CritPt | 10% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.4% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 48.8% | — |

## Math

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.6 (#39)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | 2.6% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 54% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 12.2% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.4% |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.6 (#51)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.9% | 41% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 36.5% | — |
| MMLU | — | 80.3% |

## Multimodal

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than Llama 3.2 90B?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.7 Code and Llama 3.2 90B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.7 Code has 19 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.