# Kimi K2.7 Code vs Llama 2-70B

> Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-7-code-vs-llama-2-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher in 4 categories and Llama 2-70B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 53.5 to 7.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 95.6% for Kimi K2.7 Code and 0% for Llama 2-70B.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2.7 Code | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 43.3 | 24.4 |
| Rank | 94 | 349 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.95 | — |
| Output $/M | $4 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)
- Llama 2-70B: 31.4 (#286)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 30.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 30.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1473 | — |
| SciCode | 47.5% | — |
| WeirdML | 54.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1079 |
| ALE-Bench | 886.23 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)
- Llama 2-70B: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 37.6% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.9% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,083 | — |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)
- Llama 2-70B: 14.4 (#325)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 149.97 | 113.79 |
| SimpleBench | 57.9% | — |
| CritPt | 10% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1073 |
| DTBench | — | 41.6% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 48.8% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 64.9% |
| CommonsenseQA 2.0 | — | 50% |
| ForecastBench | — | 51.4 |
| HellaSwag | — | 85.3% |
| LAMBADA | — | 78.9% |
| PIQA | — | 82.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.2% |

## Math

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)
- Llama 2-70B: 8.1 (#326)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | 0% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 54% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 12.2% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1091 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 3.3% |
| GSM8K | — | 69.6% |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)
- Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#310)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.9% | 26.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 36.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1039 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 88.6% |
| MMLU | — | 69.9% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 60.2% |
| TriviaQA | — | 87.6% |

## Multilingual

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- Llama 2-70B: 27.7 (#274)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1045 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 995 |
| LMArena French | — | 1090 |
| LMArena German | — | 1041 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 927 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 964 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1143 |

## Instruction Following

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- Llama 2-70B: 54.9 (#278)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1071 |

## Long Context

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#270)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1062 |

## Writing & Preference

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#279)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1115 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1075 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1088 |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than Llama 2-70B?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Kimi K2.7 Code or Llama 2-70B better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.7 Code and Llama 2-70B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.7 Code has 19 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-70B has 35.