# Kimi K2.7 Code vs Llama 13b

> Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-7-code-vs-llama-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher in 3 categories and Llama 13b in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 52.9 to 26.7.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2.7 Code | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 43.3 | 24.4 |
| Rank | 94 | 348 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.95 | — |
| Output $/M | $4 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)
- Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 30.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 30.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1473 | — |
| SciCode | 47.5% | — |
| WeirdML | 54.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 683 |
| ALE-Bench | 886.23 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 37.6% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.9% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,083 | — |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)
- Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 149.97 | 100.58 |
| SimpleBench | 57.9% | — |
| CritPt | 10% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 728 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 48.8% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |

## Math

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)
- Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 54% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 12.2% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 838 |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.9% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 36.5% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| MMLU | — | 47.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |

## Multimodal

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |

## Multilingual

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 819 |

## Instruction Following

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 781 |

## Writing & Preference

- Kimi K2.7 Code: —
- Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 753 |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than Llama 13b?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Kimi K2.7 Code or Llama 13b better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.7 Code and Llama 13b share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Kimi K2.7 Code has 19 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.