# Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen3.5-Flash

> Kimi K2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.5-Flash costs 5.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-5-vs-qwen3-5-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 28

## Summary

- They share 28 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen3.5-Flash in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Kimi K2.5 leads 48.8 to 34.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SimpleQA Verified: 34.3% for Kimi K2.5 and 20.3% for Qwen3.5-Flash.
- Qwen3.5-Flash is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.45 / $2.25 for Kimi K2.5.
- Qwen3.5-Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- Kimi K2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2.5 | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 48.1 | 42.5 |
| Rank | 57 | 112 |
| Context | 262K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.45 | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | $2.25 | $0.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Kimi K2.5: 48.8 (#53)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 34.2 (#242)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1437 | 1244 |
| LMArena Coding | 1474 | 1412 |
| ALE-Bench | 821.65 | 221.8 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 73.8% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 70.8% | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 67.3% | — |
| SciCode | 49% | — |
| WeirdML | 45.6% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Kimi K2.5: 34.2 (#48)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | 1,198 | 462.69 |
| Terminal-Bench | 43.2% | — |
| OSWorld | 63.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2.5: 31.2 (#80)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 33.7 (#72)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 12% | 21% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 1403 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 148.03 | 143.98 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 11.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 46.8% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 78.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 69.9% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 65.3% | — |
| CritPt | 3.1% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 3.4% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 69.4% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 20% |
| DTBench | — | 82.9% |
| LMCA | — | 29.1% |

## Math

- Kimi K2.5: 51.8 (#53)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 37.4 (#158)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 92.2% | 84.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1470 | 1407 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 27.9% | 6.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | 0% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.2% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 62.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2.5: 53.6 (#56)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 43.2 (#93)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.6% | 82.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 34.3% | 20.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 14.2% | 10.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1466 | 1407 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 24.4% | — |

## Multimodal

- Kimi K2.5: 41.1 (#39)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1269 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1430 | — |

## Multilingual

- Kimi K2.5: 53.9 (#53)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 50.5 (#121)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1433 | 1385 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | 1446 |
| LMArena French | 1454 | 1412 |
| LMArena German | 1441 | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1421 | 1368 |
| LMArena Korean | 1410 | 1344 |
| LMArena Russian | 1435 | 1379 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1450 | 1400 |

## Instruction Following

- Kimi K2.5: 75.3 (#64)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 72.6 (#139)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1431 | 1374 |

## Long Context

- Kimi K2.5: 52.1 (#7)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 42.4 (#124)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1445 | 1392 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 86.1% | — |
| CL-bench | 19.3% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 13.2% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Kimi K2.5: 65.1 (#53)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 57.9 (#122)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1423 | 1343 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1444 | 1393 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1579 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2.5 better than Qwen3.5-Flash?

Kimi K2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.5-Flash costs 5.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.5 or Qwen3.5-Flash?

Qwen3.5-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.5 lists at $0.45 and $2.25.

### Is Kimi K2.5 or Qwen3.5-Flash better for coding?

Kimi K2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.8 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.5-Flash does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 and Qwen3.5-Flash share?

28 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 has 51 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-Flash has 32.