# Kimi K2.5 vs o3-pro

> Kimi K2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-5-vs-o3-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 7

## Summary

- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 scores higher in 3 categories and o3-pro in 2 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.5 leads 53.6 to 29.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 45.6% for Kimi K2.5 and 58.2% for o3-pro.
- Kimi K2.5 is cheaper at $0.45 / $2.25 per million input/output tokens, against $20 / $80 for o3-pro.
- Kimi K2.5 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 200K.
- Kimi K2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2.5 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 48.1 | 42.9 |
| Rank | 57 | 105 |
| Context | 262K | 200K |
| Input $/M | $0.45 | $20 |
| Output $/M | $2.25 | $80 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Kimi K2.5: 48.8 (#53)
- o3-pro: 55.5 (#24)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 45.6% | 58.2% |
| SWE-bench Verified | 73.8% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 70.8% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 84.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1437 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 67.3% | — |
| SciCode | 49% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1474 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 821.65 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Kimi K2.5: 34.2 (#48)
- o3-pro: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 43.2% | — |
| OSWorld | 63.3% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 1,198 | — |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2.5: 31.2 (#80)
- o3-pro: 23.8 (#171)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 11.8% | 4.9% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 78.5% | 72.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 65.3% | 59.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 148.03 | 147.42 |
| SimpleBench | 46.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 69.9% | — |
| CritPt | 3.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 12% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 3.4% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 69.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | — |
| DTBench | — | 86.9% |
| LMCA | — | 38.5% |

## Math

- Kimi K2.5: 51.8 (#53)
- o3-pro: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 62.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 92.2% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1470 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 27.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2.5: 53.6 (#56)
- o3-pro: 29.5 (#238)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 14.2% | 23.3% |
| GPQA Diamond | 87.6% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 24.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 34.3% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 14.2% |
| LMArena Expert | 1466 | — |

## Multimodal

- Kimi K2.5: 41.1 (#39)
- o3-pro: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1269 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1430 | — |

## Multilingual

- Kimi K2.5: 53.9 (#53)
- o3-pro: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1433 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | — |
| LMArena French | 1454 | — |
| LMArena German | 1441 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1421 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1410 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1435 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1450 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Kimi K2.5: 75.3 (#64)
- o3-pro: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1431 | — |

## Long Context

- Kimi K2.5: 52.1 (#7)
- o3-pro: 72.2 (#1)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 86.1% | 97.2% |
| CL-bench | 19.3% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 13.2% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1445 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Kimi K2.5: 65.1 (#53)
- o3-pro: 57.1 (#133)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1423 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 84.4% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1579 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1444 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2.5 better than o3-pro?

Kimi K2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.5 or o3-pro?

Kimi K2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.45 per million input tokens and $2.25 per million output tokens; o3-pro lists at $20 and $80.

### Is Kimi K2.5 or o3-pro better for coding?

o3-pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 48.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Kimi K2.5 does, with 262K tokens against 200K.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 and o3-pro share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 has 51 scored results on Noometry and o3-pro has 12.