# Kimi K2.5 Instant vs Qwen Max

> Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-5-instant-vs-qwen-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen Max in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 39.4 to 22.3.
- Kimi K2.5 Instant has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 34.7 |
| Rank | 89 | 230 |
| Context | — | 33K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $6.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97)
- Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1484 | 1288 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1404 | — |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90)
- Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1269 |

## Math

- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105)
- Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1442 | 1275 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123)
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | 1248 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |

## Multimodal

- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50)
- Qwen Max: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1254 | — |

## Multilingual

- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94)
- Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1406 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1449 | 1254 |
| LMArena French | 1403 | 1330 |
| LMArena German | 1413 | 1254 |
| LMArena Korean | 1378 | 1142 |
| LMArena Russian | 1404 | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1447 | 1290 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1205 |

## Instruction Following

- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65)
- Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1430 | 1262 |

## Long Context

- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83)
- Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1288 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |

## Writing & Preference

- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95)
- Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1381 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1427 | 1277 |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2.5 Instant better than Qwen Max?

Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Kimi K2.5 Instant or Qwen Max better for coding?

Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.6 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 Instant and Qwen Max share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.