# Kimi K2.5 Instant vs phi-3-medium 14B

> Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-5-instant-vs-phi-3-medium-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 39.5 to 9.1.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2.5 Instant | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 92 | 306 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.3 (#95)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 36.3 (#198)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1404 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1483 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 28.5 (#88)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.18 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |

## Math

- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 36.6 (#105)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 25.2 (#249)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1443 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.5 (#121)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#301)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1438 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |

## Multimodal

- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.5 (#47)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1254 | — |

## Multilingual

- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.2 (#89)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1450 | — |
| LMArena French | 1403 | — |
| LMArena German | 1413 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1378 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1448 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.5 (#61)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1430 | — |

## Long Context

- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.8 (#82)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.8 (#91)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1379 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1427 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2.5 Instant better than phi-3-medium 14B?

Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Kimi K2.5 Instant or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 Instant and phi-3-medium 14B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.