# Kimi K2.5 Instant vs Llama 13b

> Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k2-5-instant-vs-llama-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 13b in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 60.6 to 13.8.

## Snapshot

| | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 24.4 |
| Rank | 89 | 348 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97)
- Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1484 | 683 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1404 | — |

## Reasoning

- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90)
- Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 728 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 100.58 |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |

## Math

- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105)
- Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1442 | 838 |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |

## Knowledge

- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| MMLU | — | 47.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |

## Multimodal

- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1254 | — |
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |

## Multilingual

- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94)
- Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1406 | 819 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1449 | — |
| LMArena French | 1403 | — |
| LMArena German | 1413 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1378 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1447 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65)
- Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1430 | 781 |

## Long Context

- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95)
- Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1381 | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1427 | 753 |

## FAQ

### Is Kimi K2.5 Instant better than Llama 13b?

Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Kimi K2.5 Instant or Llama 13b better for coding?

Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.6 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 Instant and Llama 13b share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.