# Inkling vs Ring-2.6-1T

> Inkling has enough public results to be ranked (#75); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/inkling-vs-ring-2-6-1t
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling scores higher in 1 category and Ring-2.6-1T in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Inkling leads 40.6 to 25.3.

## Snapshot

| | Inkling | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Thinking Machines Lab | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 44.1 | 36.3 |
| Rank | 75 | — |
| Context | 66K | — |
| Input $/M | $1.87 | — |
| Output $/M | $4.68 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Inkling: 34.1 (#229)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 40.1

| Benchmark | Inkling | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 47% | 42.4% |
| ALE-Bench | 946 | 432.57 |
| FrontierCode | 14% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1412 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 4.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 32.3% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1463 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Inkling: 29.5 (#76)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Inkling | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 33.8% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 25% | — |

## Reasoning

- Inkling: 40.6 (#48)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 25.3

| Benchmark | Inkling | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 5.4% | 3.7% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 36.5% | — |
| SimpleBench | 50% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 79.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1452 | — |
| DTBench | 87.5% | — |
| LMCA | 37.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 148.6 | — |

## Math

- Inkling: 31.2 (#198)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Inkling | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 33.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 4.9% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | — |
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1482 | — |

## Knowledge

- Inkling: 55.2 (#44)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Inkling | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 88.3% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 40.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1468 | — |

## Multilingual

- Inkling: 54.2 (#49)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Inkling | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | — |
| LMArena French | 1453 | — |
| LMArena German | 1456 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1428 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1401 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1430 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1442 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Inkling: 75.3 (#65)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Inkling | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1427 | — |

## Long Context

- Inkling: 43.9 (#79)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Inkling | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1436 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Inkling: 65.5 (#48)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Inkling | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1443 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1390 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1611 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1226 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Inkling better than Ring-2.6-1T?

Inkling has enough public results to be ranked (#75); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is Inkling or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?

Ring-2.6-1T scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Inkling and Ring-2.6-1T share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling has 41 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.