# Inkling vs Qwen3.7 Plus

> Inkling and Qwen3.7 Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (44.1 vs 45.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/inkling-vs-qwen3-7-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 27

## Summary

- They share 27 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 49.3 to 31.2.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.60 per million input/output tokens, against $1.87 / $4.68 for Inkling.
- Qwen3.7 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 66K.
- Inkling has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Inkling | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Thinking Machines Lab | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 44.1 | 45.0 |
| Rank | 75 | 66 |
| Context | 66K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $1.87 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $4.68 | $1.60 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Inkling: 34.1 (#229)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.1 (#200)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | 14% | 10.2% |
| SciCode | 47% | 45.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1463 | 1473 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1412 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 4.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 32.3% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 946 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Inkling: 29.5 (#76)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.2 (#130)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 33.8% | — |
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |
| τ²-bench Banking | 25% | — |

## Reasoning

- Inkling: 40.6 (#48)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 38.4 (#54)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 5.4% | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | 24% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1452 | 1460 |
| DTBench | 87.5% | 84% |
| LMCA | 37.6% | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 148.6 | 147.39 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 36.5% | — |
| SimpleBench | 50% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 79.5% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |

## Math

- Inkling: 31.2 (#198)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 49.3 (#47)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 33.3% | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | 93.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1482 | 1467 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 4.9% | — |
| ProofBench | 0% | — |

## Knowledge

- Inkling: 55.2 (#44)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#46)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 88.3% | 87.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1468 | 1467 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 40.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Inkling: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.2 (#30)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1281 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- Inkling: 54.2 (#49)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 55.0 (#36)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | 1510 |
| LMArena French | 1453 | 1471 |
| LMArena German | 1456 | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1428 | 1411 |
| LMArena Korean | 1401 | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | 1430 | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1442 | 1453 |

## Instruction Following

- Inkling: 75.3 (#65)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.9 (#49)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1427 | 1439 |

## Long Context

- Inkling: 43.9 (#79)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#61)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1436 | 1454 |

## Writing & Preference

- Inkling: 65.5 (#48)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.5 (#54)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1443 | 1454 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1390 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | 1459 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1611 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1226 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Inkling better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Inkling and Qwen3.7 Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (44.1 vs 45.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Inkling or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; Inkling lists at $1.87 and $4.68.

### Is Inkling or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 66K.

### How many benchmarks do Inkling and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

27 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling has 41 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.