# Inkling vs Qwen3.6 Plus

> Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 44.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/inkling-vs-qwen3-6-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 29

## Summary

- They share 29 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3.6 Plus in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 51.8 to 31.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 47% for Inkling and 40.7% for Qwen3.6 Plus.
- Qwen3.6 Plus is cheaper at $0.50 / $3 per million input/output tokens, against $1.87 / $4.68 for Inkling.
- Qwen3.6 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 66K.
- Inkling has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Inkling | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Thinking Machines Lab | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 44.1 | 47.5 |
| Rank | 80 | 62 |
| Context | 66K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $1.87 | $0.50 |
| Output $/M | $4.68 | $3 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Inkling: 34.5 (#234)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.8 (#130)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1413 | 1461 |
| SciCode | 47% | 40.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1464 | 1467 |
| ALE-Bench | 946 | 670.15 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 57.9% |
| FrontierCode | 14% | — |
| FrontierSWE | 4.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 32.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Inkling: 29.6 (#85)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Inkling | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 33.8% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 25% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,115 |

## Reasoning

- Inkling: 40.4 (#56)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 29.3 (#93)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 5.4% | 2.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | 17% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1451 | 1449 |
| DTBench | 87.5% | 81.9% |
| LMCA | 37.6% | 33.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 148.54 | 147.65 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 36.5% | — |
| SimpleBench | 50% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 60.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 79.5% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 59.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 12% |

## Math

- Inkling: 31.3 (#225)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 51.8 (#54)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 33.3% | 38.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | 93.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1479 | 1450 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 4.9% | — |
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 26.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 8.3% |

## Knowledge

- Inkling: 55.1 (#49)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#45)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 88.3% | 88.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 40.3% | 44.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1465 | 1454 |

## Multilingual

- Inkling: 54.0 (#52)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.3 (#70)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | 1424 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1490 | 1477 |
| LMArena French | 1458 | 1455 |
| LMArena German | 1446 | 1452 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1429 | 1389 |
| LMArena Korean | 1404 | 1379 |
| LMArena Russian | 1429 | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1448 | 1432 |

## Instruction Following

- Inkling: 75.1 (#71)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.0 (#74)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1426 | 1425 |

## Long Context

- Inkling: 43.8 (#86)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.2 (#49)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1434 | 1439 |
| CL-bench | — | 20.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- Inkling: 65.2 (#51)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.2 (#82)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1441 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1387 | 1404 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | 1438 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1611 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1226 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Inkling better than Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 44.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Inkling or Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $3 per million output tokens; Inkling lists at $1.87 and $4.68.

### Is Inkling or Qwen3.6 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 34.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.6 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 66K.

### How many benchmarks do Inkling and Qwen3.6 Plus share?

29 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling has 41 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Plus has 37.