# Inkling vs Qwen1.5 4b Chat

> Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 28.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/inkling-vs-qwen1-5-4b-chat
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5 4b Chat in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Inkling leads 65.5 to 23.9.

## Snapshot

| | Inkling | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Thinking Machines Lab | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 44.1 | 28.3 |
| Rank | 75 | 319 |
| Context | 66K | — |
| Input $/M | $1.87 | — |
| Output $/M | $4.68 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Inkling: 34.1 (#229)
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 28.6 (#305)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1463 | 999 |
| FrontierCode | 14% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1412 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 4.1% | — |
| SciCode | 47% | — |
| WeirdML | 32.3% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 946 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Inkling: 29.5 (#76)
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: —

| Benchmark | Inkling | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 33.8% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 25% | — |

## Reasoning

- Inkling: 40.6 (#48)
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 17.7 (#277)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1452 | 976 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 36.5% | — |
| SimpleBench | 50% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 79.5% | — |
| CritPt | 5.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | — |
| DTBench | 87.5% | — |
| LMCA | 37.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 148.6 | — |

## Math

- Inkling: 31.2 (#198)
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 27.9 (#233)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1482 | 1026 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 33.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 4.9% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | — |
| ProofBench | 0% | — |

## Knowledge

- Inkling: 55.2 (#44)
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 26.2 (#252)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1468 | 980 |
| GPQA Diamond | 88.3% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 40.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Inkling: 54.2 (#49)
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 24.2 (#285)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | 979 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | 1024 |
| LMArena German | 1456 | 902 |
| LMArena Russian | 1430 | 952 |
| LMArena French | 1453 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1428 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1401 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1442 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Inkling: 75.3 (#65)
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 49.3 (#295)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1427 | 979 |

## Long Context

- Inkling: 43.9 (#79)
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.1 (#285)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1436 | 988 |

## Writing & Preference

- Inkling: 65.5 (#48)
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 23.9 (#304)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1443 | 997 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1390 | 969 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | 977 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1611 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1226 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Inkling better than Qwen1.5 4b Chat?

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 28.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Inkling or Qwen1.5 4b Chat better for coding?

Inkling scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.1 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Inkling and Qwen1.5 4b Chat share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling has 41 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5 4b Chat has 13.