# Inkling vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

> Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/inkling-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Inkling leads 55.1 to 35.7.

## Snapshot

| | Inkling | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Thinking Machines Lab | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 44.1 | 37.9 |
| Rank | 80 | 191 |
| Context | 66K | — |
| Input $/M | $1.87 | — |
| Output $/M | $4.68 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Inkling: 34.5 (#234)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1464 | 1291 |
| FrontierCode | 14% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1413 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 4.1% | — |
| SciCode | 47% | — |
| WeirdML | 32.3% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 946 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Inkling: 29.6 (#85)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | Inkling | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 33.8% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 25% | — |

## Reasoning

- Inkling: 40.4 (#56)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1451 | 1272 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 36.5% | — |
| SimpleBench | 50% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 79.5% | — |
| CritPt | 5.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | — |
| DTBench | 87.5% | — |
| LMCA | 37.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 148.54 | — |

## Math

- Inkling: 31.3 (#225)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1479 | 1305 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 33.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 4.9% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | — |
| ProofBench | 0% | — |

## Knowledge

- Inkling: 55.1 (#49)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1465 | 1295 |
| GPQA Diamond | 88.3% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 40.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Inkling: 54.0 (#52)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1490 | 1242 |
| LMArena French | 1458 | 1260 |
| LMArena German | 1446 | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | 1429 | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1448 | 1289 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1429 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1404 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Inkling: 75.1 (#71)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1426 | 1247 |

## Long Context

- Inkling: 43.8 (#86)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1434 | 1272 |

## Writing & Preference

- Inkling: 65.2 (#51)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1441 | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1387 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | 1252 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1611 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1226 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Inkling better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Inkling or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 34.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Inkling and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling has 41 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.