# Inkling vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

> Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/inkling-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Inkling leads 55.2 to 35.4.

## Snapshot

| | Inkling | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Thinking Machines Lab | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 44.1 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 75 | 168 |
| Context | 66K | — |
| Input $/M | $1.87 | — |
| Output $/M | $4.68 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Inkling: 34.1 (#229)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1463 | 1346 |
| FrontierCode | 14% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1412 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 4.1% | — |
| SciCode | 47% | — |
| WeirdML | 32.3% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 946 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Inkling: 29.5 (#76)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Inkling | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 33.8% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 25% | — |

## Reasoning

- Inkling: 40.6 (#48)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1452 | 1322 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 36.5% | — |
| SimpleBench | 50% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 79.5% | — |
| CritPt | 5.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | — |
| DTBench | 87.5% | — |
| LMCA | 37.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 148.6 | — |

## Math

- Inkling: 31.2 (#198)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1482 | 1305 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 33.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 4.9% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | — |
| ProofBench | 0% | — |

## Knowledge

- Inkling: 55.2 (#44)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1468 | 1307 |
| GPQA Diamond | 88.3% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 40.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Inkling: 54.2 (#49)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | 1304 |
| LMArena French | 1453 | 1328 |
| LMArena German | 1456 | 1283 |
| LMArena Korean | 1401 | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | 1430 | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1442 | 1337 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1428 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Inkling: 75.3 (#65)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1427 | 1298 |

## Long Context

- Inkling: 43.9 (#79)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1436 | 1312 |

## Writing & Preference

- Inkling: 65.5 (#48)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1443 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1390 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | 1309 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1611 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1226 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Inkling better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Inkling or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Inkling and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling has 41 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.