# Inkling vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B

> Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/inkling-vs-olmo-2-furious-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Inkling leads 55.1 to 18.3.

## Snapshot

| | Inkling | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Thinking Machines Lab | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 44.1 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 80 | 304 |
| Context | 66K | — |
| Input $/M | $1.87 | — |
| Output $/M | $4.68 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Inkling: 34.5 (#234)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)

| Benchmark | Inkling | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | 14% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1413 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 4.1% | — |
| SciCode | 47% | — |
| WeirdML | 32.3% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1464 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 946 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Inkling: 29.6 (#85)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

| Benchmark | Inkling | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 33.8% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 25% | — |

## Reasoning

- Inkling: 40.4 (#56)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)

| Benchmark | Inkling | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 36.5% | — |
| SimpleBench | 50% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 79.5% | — |
| CritPt | 5.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1451 | — |
| DTBench | 87.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LMCA | 37.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 148.54 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |

## Math

- Inkling: 31.3 (#225)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)

| Benchmark | Inkling | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 33.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 4.9% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | — |
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1479 | — |

## Knowledge

- Inkling: 55.1 (#49)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)

| Benchmark | Inkling | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 88.3% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 40.3% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1465 | — |

## Multilingual

- Inkling: 54.0 (#52)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

| Benchmark | Inkling | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1490 | — |
| LMArena French | 1458 | — |
| LMArena German | 1446 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1429 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1429 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1448 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Inkling: 75.1 (#71)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)

| Benchmark | Inkling | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1426 | — |

## Long Context

- Inkling: 43.8 (#86)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

| Benchmark | Inkling | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1434 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Inkling: 65.2 (#51)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)

| Benchmark | Inkling | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1441 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1387 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1611 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1226 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |

## FAQ

### Is Inkling better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Inkling or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?

Inkling scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.5 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Inkling and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling has 41 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.