# Inkling vs Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo

> Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 44.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/inkling-vs-kimi-k2-thinking-turbo
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 21

## Summary

- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling scores higher in 6 categories and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 47.4 to 31.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 88.9% for Inkling and 83.1% for Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo.

## Snapshot

| | Inkling | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Thinking Machines Lab | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 44.1 | 45.8 |
| Rank | 80 | 70 |
| Context | 66K | — |
| Input $/M | $1.87 | — |
| Output $/M | $4.68 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Inkling: 34.5 (#234)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1413 | 1322 |
| LMArena Coding | 1464 | 1454 |
| FrontierCode | 14% | — |
| FrontierSWE | 4.1% | — |
| SciCode | 47% | — |
| WeirdML | 32.3% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 946 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Inkling: 29.6 (#85)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: —

| Benchmark | Inkling | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 33.8% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 25% | — |

## Reasoning

- Inkling: 40.4 (#56)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | 20% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1451 | 1428 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 36.5% | — |
| SimpleBench | 50% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 79.5% | — |
| CritPt | 5.4% | — |
| DTBench | 87.5% | — |
| LMCA | 37.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 148.54 | — |

## Math

- Inkling: 31.3 (#225)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | 83.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1479 | 1429 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 33.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 4.9% | — |
| ProofBench | 0% | — |

## Knowledge

- Inkling: 55.1 (#49)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 88.3% | 84.2% |
| LMArena Expert | 1465 | 1439 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 40.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Inkling: 54.0 (#52)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | 1398 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1490 | 1456 |
| LMArena French | 1458 | 1425 |
| LMArena German | 1446 | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1429 | 1357 |
| LMArena Korean | 1404 | 1330 |
| LMArena Russian | 1429 | 1391 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1448 | 1406 |

## Instruction Following

- Inkling: 75.1 (#71)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1426 | 1403 |

## Long Context

- Inkling: 43.8 (#86)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1434 | 1415 |

## Writing & Preference

- Inkling: 65.2 (#51)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1441 | 1415 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1387 | 1374 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | 1414 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1611 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1226 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Inkling better than Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 44.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Inkling or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better for coding?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 34.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Inkling and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling has 41 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21.
