# Inkling vs Kimi K2.7 Code

> Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index. Kimi K2.7 Code costs 1.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Inkling's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/inkling-vs-kimi-k2-7-code
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling scores higher in 3 categories and Kimi K2.7 Code in 2 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 52.6 to 31.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 32.3% for Inkling and 54.1% for Kimi K2.7 Code.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is cheaper at $0.95 / $4 per million input/output tokens, against $1.87 / $4.68 for Inkling.
- Kimi K2.7 Code accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 66K.

## Snapshot

| | Inkling | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Thinking Machines Lab | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 44.1 | 43.0 |
| Rank | 75 | 90 |
| Context | 66K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $1.87 | $0.95 |
| Output $/M | $4.68 | $4 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Inkling: 34.1 (#229)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.4 (#92)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | 14% | 30.1% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1412 | 1473 |
| SciCode | 47% | 47.5% |
| WeirdML | 32.3% | 54.1% |
| ALE-Bench | 946 | 886.23 |
| DeepSWE | — | 30.5% |
| FrontierSWE | 4.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1463 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Inkling: 29.5 (#76)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 23.9 (#115)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 33.8% | 37.6% |
| τ²-bench Banking | 25% | — |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,083 |

## Reasoning

- Inkling: 40.6 (#48)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 38.2 (#56)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 50% | 57.9% |
| CritPt | 5.4% | 10% |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | 21% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 148.6 | 150.01 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 36.5% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 79.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1452 | — |
| DTBench | 87.5% | — |
| LMCA | 37.6% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 48.8% |

## Math

- Inkling: 31.2 (#198)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.6 (#39)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 33.3% | 54% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 4.9% | 12.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | 95.6% |
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1482 | — |

## Knowledge

- Inkling: 55.2 (#44)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.6 (#51)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 88.3% | 87.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 40.3% | 36.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1468 | — |

## Multilingual

- Inkling: 54.2 (#49)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Inkling | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | — |
| LMArena French | 1453 | — |
| LMArena German | 1456 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1428 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1401 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1430 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1442 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Inkling: 75.3 (#65)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Inkling | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1427 | — |

## Long Context

- Inkling: 43.9 (#79)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Inkling | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1436 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Inkling: 65.5 (#48)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Inkling | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1443 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1390 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1611 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1226 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Inkling better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index. Kimi K2.7 Code costs 1.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Inkling's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Inkling or Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code is cheaper. It lists at $0.95 per million input tokens and $4 per million output tokens; Inkling lists at $1.87 and $4.68.

### Is Inkling or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Kimi K2.7 Code does, with 262K tokens against 66K.

### How many benchmarks do Inkling and Kimi K2.7 Code share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling has 41 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.