# Inkling vs Kimi K2.6

> Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 44.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/inkling-vs-kimi-k2-6
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 34

## Summary

- They share 34 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling scores higher in 3 categories and Kimi K2.6 in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.6 leads 56.8 to 31.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 33.3% for Inkling and 57.2% for Kimi K2.6.
- Kimi K2.6 is cheaper at $0.95 / $4 per million input/output tokens, against $1.87 / $4.68 for Inkling.
- Kimi K2.6 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 66K.

## Snapshot

| | Inkling | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Thinking Machines Lab | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 44.1 | 47.5 |
| Rank | 75 | 52 |
| Context | 66K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $1.87 | $0.95 |
| Output $/M | $4.68 | $4 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Inkling: 34.1 (#229)
- Kimi K2.6: 50.5 (#41)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1412 | 1509 |
| SciCode | 47% | 53.5% |
| WeirdML | 32.3% | 55.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1463 | 1488 |
| ALE-Bench | 946 | 1,093 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 76.7% |
| FrontierCode | 14% | — |
| FrontierSWE | 4.1% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Inkling: 29.5 (#76)
- Kimi K2.6: 21.8 (#128)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 33.8% | — |
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 4.6% |
| τ²-bench Banking | 25% | — |
| ExploitBench | — | 18.4% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 12% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 6,205 |

## Reasoning

- Inkling: 40.6 (#48)
- Kimi K2.6: 39.6 (#51)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 5.4% | 8% |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | 26% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1452 | 1470 |
| DTBench | 87.5% | 90.9% |
| LMCA | 37.6% | 37.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 148.6 | 151.03 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 36.5% | — |
| SimpleBench | 50% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 87.2% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 79.5% | — |
| EBR-Bench | — | 2.4% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |

## Math

- Inkling: 31.2 (#198)
- Kimi K2.6: 56.8 (#34)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 33.3% | 57.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 4.9% | 25.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | 96.1% |
| ProofBench | 0% | 16% |
| LMArena Math | 1482 | 1475 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 72.9% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 39% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 14.6% |

## Knowledge

- Inkling: 55.2 (#44)
- Kimi K2.6: 53.9 (#48)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 88.3% | 90.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 40.3% | 34.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1468 | 1491 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.8% |

## Multimodal

- Inkling: —
- Kimi K2.6: 31.8 (#95)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1282 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 3.9% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 21.7% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1451 |

## Multilingual

- Inkling: 54.2 (#49)
- Kimi K2.6: 55.1 (#35)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | 1446 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | 1521 |
| LMArena French | 1453 | 1471 |
| LMArena German | 1456 | 1449 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1428 | 1442 |
| LMArena Korean | 1401 | 1428 |
| LMArena Russian | 1430 | 1446 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1442 | 1463 |

## Instruction Following

- Inkling: 75.3 (#65)
- Kimi K2.6: 76.5 (#40)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1427 | 1451 |

## Long Context

- Inkling: 43.9 (#79)
- Kimi K2.6: 44.9 (#50)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1436 | 1468 |

## Writing & Preference

- Inkling: 65.5 (#48)
- Kimi K2.6: 68.7 (#25)

| Benchmark | Inkling | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1443 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1390 | 1434 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1611 | 1725 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1226 | 1202 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | 1453 |

## FAQ

### Is Inkling better than Kimi K2.6?

Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 44.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Inkling or Kimi K2.6?

Kimi K2.6 is cheaper. It lists at $0.95 per million input tokens and $4 per million output tokens; Inkling lists at $1.87 and $4.68.

### Is Inkling or Kimi K2.6 better for coding?

Kimi K2.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.5 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Kimi K2.6 does, with 262K tokens against 66K.

### How many benchmarks do Inkling and Kimi K2.6 share?

34 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling has 41 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.6 has 51.