# Inkling-Small vs Ring-2.6-1T

> Inkling-Small has enough public results to be ranked (#57); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/inkling-small-vs-ring-2-6-1t
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling-Small scores higher in 2 categories and Ring-2.6-1T in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Inkling-Small leads 39.0 to 25.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 48.7% for Inkling-Small and 42.4% for Ring-2.6-1T.

## Snapshot

| | Inkling-Small | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Thinking Machines Lab | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 46.5 | 36.3 |
| Rank | 57 | — |
| Context | 524K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.45 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Inkling-Small: 43.3 (#80)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 40.1

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 48.7% | 42.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1451 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 432.57 |

## Reasoning

- Inkling-Small: 39.0 (#53)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 25.3

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 8.3% | 3.7% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 40.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 84% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 18% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1424 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.13 | — |

## Math

- Inkling-Small: 44.9 (#65)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 46.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 17.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 90% | — |
| ProofBench | 6% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1453 | — |

## Knowledge

- Inkling-Small: 48.3 (#71)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 88.5% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 19.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1442 | — |

## Multimodal

- Inkling-Small: 38.4 (#59)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1235 | — |

## Multilingual

- Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#102)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1400 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1458 | — |
| LMArena French | 1438 | — |
| LMArena German | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1399 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1426 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Inkling-Small: 73.9 (#112)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1397 | — |

## Long Context

- Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#113)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1401 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Inkling-Small: 59.8 (#102)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1413 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1330 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1491 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1420 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Inkling-Small better than Ring-2.6-1T?

Inkling-Small has enough public results to be ranked (#57); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is Inkling-Small or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?

Inkling-Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Inkling-Small and Ring-2.6-1T share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling-Small has 33 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.