# Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.7 Plus

> Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/inkling-small-vs-qwen3-7-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 26

## Summary

- They share 26 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling-Small scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Plus in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Inkling-Small leads 43.6 to 36.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 46.3% for Inkling-Small and 34.4% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
- Inkling-Small is cheaper at $0.45 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.60 for Qwen3.7 Plus.
- Qwen3.7 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 524K.
- Inkling-Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Inkling-Small | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Thinking Machines Lab | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 46.5 | 45.3 |
| Rank | 63 | 72 |
| Context | 524K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.45 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $1.20 | $1.60 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Inkling-Small: 43.6 (#85)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 48.7% | 45.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1451 | 1473 |
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1409 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Inkling-Small: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |

## Reasoning

- Inkling-Small: 38.6 (#63)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 8.3% | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | 18% | 24% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1423 | 1460 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 6% | 17% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.15 | 147.37 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 40.1% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 84% | — |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |

## Math

- Inkling-Small: 45.1 (#77)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 46.3% | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 90% | 93.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1459 | 1466 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 17.1% | — |
| ProofBench | 6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Inkling-Small: 48.2 (#77)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 88.5% | 87.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1442 | 1467 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 19.1% | — |

## Multimodal

- Inkling-Small: 39.1 (#62)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1235 | 1279 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#104)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1402 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1510 |
| LMArena French | 1436 | 1473 |
| LMArena German | 1405 | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1405 | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | 1363 | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1428 | 1457 |

## Instruction Following

- Inkling-Small: 73.8 (#114)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1399 | 1440 |

## Long Context

- Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#118)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1401 | 1455 |

## Writing & Preference

- Inkling-Small: 59.6 (#107)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1414 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1418 | 1460 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1491 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Inkling-Small better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Inkling-Small or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Inkling-Small is cheaper. It lists at $0.45 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.60.

### Is Inkling-Small or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Inkling-Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 524K.

### How many benchmarks do Inkling-Small and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

26 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling-Small has 33 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.