# Inkling-Small vs Qwen1.5-72B

> Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/inkling-small-vs-qwen1-5-72b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling-Small scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-72B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Inkling-Small leads 48.3 to 11.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 88.5% for Inkling-Small and 28.8% for Qwen1.5-72B.

## Snapshot

| | Inkling-Small | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Thinking Machines Lab | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 46.5 | 30.3 |
| Rank | 57 | 282 |
| Context | 524K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.45 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Inkling-Small: 43.3 (#80)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 31.4 (#272)

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1451 | 1166 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1408 | — |
| SciCode | 48.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.3% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 59.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.6% |

## Reasoning

- Inkling-Small: 39.0 (#53)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 21.2 (#201)

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1424 | 1148 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 40.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 84% | — |
| CritPt | 8.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 18% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.13 | — |

## Math

- Inkling-Small: 44.9 (#65)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 30.7 (#205)

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1453 | 1164 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 46.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 17.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 90% | — |
| ProofBench | 6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Inkling-Small: 48.3 (#71)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#295)

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 88.5% | 28.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1442 | 1136 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 19.1% | — |

## Multimodal

- Inkling-Small: 38.4 (#59)
- Qwen1.5-72B: —

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1235 | — |

## Multilingual

- Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#102)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 33.4 (#248)

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1400 | 1135 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1458 | 1186 |
| LMArena French | 1438 | 1158 |
| LMArena German | 1412 | 1084 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1399 | 1061 |
| LMArena Korean | 1355 | 1049 |
| LMArena Russian | 1392 | 1104 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1426 | 1110 |

## Instruction Following

- Inkling-Small: 73.9 (#112)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 59.6 (#251)

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1397 | 1142 |

## Long Context

- Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#113)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 35.0 (#238)

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1401 | 1157 |

## Writing & Preference

- Inkling-Small: 59.8 (#102)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 37.4 (#253)

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1413 | 1166 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1330 | 1137 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1420 | 1160 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1491 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Inkling-Small better than Qwen1.5-72B?

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Inkling-Small or Qwen1.5-72B better for coding?

Inkling-Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Inkling-Small and Qwen1.5-72B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling-Small has 33 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.