# Inkling-Small vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

> Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/inkling-small-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling-Small scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Inkling-Small leads 51.7 to 38.1.

## Snapshot

| | Inkling-Small | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Thinking Machines Lab | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 46.5 | 37.9 |
| Rank | 63 | 191 |
| Context | 524K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.45 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Inkling-Small: 43.6 (#85)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1451 | 1291 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1409 | — |
| SciCode | 48.7% | — |

## Reasoning

- Inkling-Small: 38.6 (#63)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1423 | 1272 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 40.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 84% | — |
| CritPt | 8.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 18% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.15 | — |

## Math

- Inkling-Small: 45.1 (#77)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1459 | 1305 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 46.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 17.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 90% | — |
| ProofBench | 6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Inkling-Small: 48.2 (#77)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1442 | 1295 |
| GPQA Diamond | 88.5% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 19.1% | — |

## Multimodal

- Inkling-Small: 39.1 (#62)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1235 | — |

## Multilingual

- Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#104)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1402 | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1242 |
| LMArena French | 1436 | 1260 |
| LMArena German | 1405 | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1428 | 1289 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1405 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1363 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Inkling-Small: 73.8 (#114)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1399 | 1247 |

## Long Context

- Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#118)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1401 | 1272 |

## Writing & Preference

- Inkling-Small: 59.6 (#107)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1414 | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1418 | 1252 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1491 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Inkling-Small better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Inkling-Small or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

Inkling-Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Inkling-Small and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling-Small has 33 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.