# Inkling-Small vs Llama 4 Scout

> Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index. Llama 4 Scout costs 4.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Inkling-Small's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/inkling-small-vs-llama-4-scout
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 26

## Summary

- They share 26 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling-Small scores higher in 9 categories and Llama 4 Scout in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Inkling-Small leads 38.6 to 9.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-1: 84% for Inkling-Small and 0.5% for Llama 4 Scout.
- Llama 4 Scout is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.45 / $1.20 for Inkling-Small.
- Inkling-Small accepts more context: 524K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Inkling-Small | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Thinking Machines Lab | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 46.5 | 27.7 |
| Rank | 63 | 330 |
| Context | 524K | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.45 | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | $1.20 | $0.30 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Inkling-Small: 43.6 (#85)
- Llama 4 Scout: 20.2 (#339)

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 48.7% | 17% |
| LMArena Coding | 1451 | 1286 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 9.1% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1409 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 43.1% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Inkling-Small: —
- Llama 4 Scout: 24.6 (#119)

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.1% |

## Reasoning

- Inkling-Small: 38.6 (#63)
- Llama 4 Scout: 9.1 (#345)

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 40.1% | 0% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 84% | 0.5% |
| CritPt | 8.3% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1423 | 1266 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.15 | 129.64 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 36.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | 18% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 6% | — |
| DTBench | — | 57.9% |
| LMCA | — | 12% |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.5 |

## Math

- Inkling-Small: 45.1 (#77)
- Llama 4 Scout: 19.6 (#286)

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 90% | 7.8% |
| LMArena Math | 1459 | 1287 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 46.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 17.1% | — |
| ProofBench | 6% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 37.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 62.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Inkling-Small: 48.2 (#77)
- Llama 4 Scout: 31.9 (#217)

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 88.5% | 51.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1442 | 1235 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 19.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 74.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 50.7% |

## Multimodal

- Inkling-Small: 39.1 (#62)
- Llama 4 Scout: 32.2 (#102)

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1235 | 1118 |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 34.2% |

## Multilingual

- Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#104)
- Llama 4 Scout: 41.0 (#212)

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1402 | 1252 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1255 |
| LMArena French | 1436 | 1282 |
| LMArena German | 1405 | 1272 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1405 | 1206 |
| LMArena Korean | 1363 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | 1263 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1428 | 1278 |

## Instruction Following

- Inkling-Small: 73.8 (#114)
- Llama 4 Scout: 65.8 (#217)

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1399 | 1248 |
| IFEval | — | 81.8% |

## Long Context

- Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#118)
- Llama 4 Scout: 27.5 (#294)

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1401 | 1265 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 36% |

## Writing & Preference

- Inkling-Small: 59.6 (#107)
- Llama 4 Scout: 37.0 (#261)

| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1414 | 1279 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | 1249 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1491 | 783 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1418 | 1280 |
| WildBench | — | 78% |

## FAQ

### Is Inkling-Small better than Llama 4 Scout?

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index. Llama 4 Scout costs 4.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Inkling-Small's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Inkling-Small or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Inkling-Small lists at $0.45 and $1.20.

### Is Inkling-Small or Llama 4 Scout better for coding?

Inkling-Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 20.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Inkling-Small does, with 524K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Inkling-Small and Llama 4 Scout share?

26 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling-Small has 33 scored results on Noometry and Llama 4 Scout has 43.