# Granite 4.0 H Small vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

> Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ibm-granite-h-small-vs-qwen2-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher in 1 category and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 49.4 to 43.8.
- Granite 4.0 H Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 214 | 181 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1249 | 1314 |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1240 | 1299 |

## Math

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1247 | 1298 |
| Omni-MATH | 29.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1251 | 1289 |
| MMLU-Pro | 56.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1249 | 1314 |
| LMArena Russian | 1201 | 1271 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1258 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1222 | 1275 |
| IFEval | 89% | — |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1242 | 1292 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1241 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1211 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1242 | 1299 |
| WildBench | 73.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.0 H Small better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 4.0 H Small or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 H Small and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 H Small has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.