# Granite 4.0 H Small vs phi-3-medium 14B

> Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ibm-granite-h-small-vs-phi-3-medium-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.0 H Small leads 31.5 to 9.1.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.0 H Small | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 213 | 306 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 35.8 (#207)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 36.3 (#198)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1247 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 23.4 (#164)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1240 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.18 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |

## Math

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 29.3 (#219)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 25.2 (#249)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 29.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1251 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.5 (#210)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#301)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | 56.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1244 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.7 (#223)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1250 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1198 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1258 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.9 (#178)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 89% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1221 | — |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.6 (#209)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1240 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 44.0 (#222)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1241 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1210 | — |
| WildBench | 73.9% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1243 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.0 H Small better than phi-3-medium 14B?

Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 4.0 H Small or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (35.8 vs 36.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 H Small and phi-3-medium 14B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 H Small has 19 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.