# Granite 4.0 H Small vs MiMo-V2-Flash

> MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ibm-granite-h-small-vs-mimo-v2-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2-Flash in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.7 to 43.8.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 214 | 138 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1249 | 1443 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1240 | 1420 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |

## Math

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1247 | 1396 |
| Omni-MATH | 29.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1251 | 1425 |
| MMLU-Pro | 56.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1249 | 1462 |
| LMArena Russian | 1201 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1258 | 1420 |
| LMArena French | — | 1429 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1222 | 1392 |
| IFEval | 89% | — |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1242 | 1409 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1241 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1211 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1242 | 1404 |
| WildBench | 73.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.0 H Small better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 4.0 H Small or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (36.4 vs 36.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 H Small and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 H Small has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.