# Granite 4.0 H Small vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ibm-granite-h-small-vs-mimo-v2-6-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 54.5 to 31.4.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 50.3 |
| Rank | 214 | 49 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1249 | 1534 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1629 |
| SciCode | — | 60.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,158 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Granite 4.0 H Small: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 59.5% |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1240 | 1512 |
| CritPt | — | 26.6% |

## Math

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1247 | 1494 |
| ProofBench | — | 70% |
| Omni-MATH | 29.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1251 | 1543 |
| MMLU-Pro | 56.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Granite 4.0 H Small: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1249 | 1529 |
| LMArena Russian | 1201 | 1480 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1258 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1222 | 1493 |
| IFEval | 89% | — |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1242 | 1501 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1241 | 1492 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1211 | 1468 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1242 | 1464 |
| WildBench | 73.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.0 H Small better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 4.0 H Small or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 H Small and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 H Small has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.