# Granite 4.0 H Small vs Mercury 2

> Mercury 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ibm-granite-h-small-vs-mercury-2
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher in 2 categories and Mercury 2 in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mercury 2 leads 53.8 to 43.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Vectara Hallucination Rate: 5.2% for Granite 4.0 H Small and 12.3% for Mercury 2.
- Granite 4.0 H Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.0 H Small | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Inception |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 39.1 |
| Rank | 214 | 175 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.75 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209)
- Mercury 2: 33.5 (#255)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1249 | 1391 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1171 |
| SciCode | — | 38.7% |
| WeirdML | — | 43.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.58 |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163)
- Mercury 2: 23.8 (#170)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1240 | 1362 |
| CritPt | — | 0.8% |

## Math

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223)
- Mercury 2: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 29.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1247 | — |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215)
- Mercury 2: 36.2 (#172)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | 12.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1251 | 1358 |
| MMLU-Pro | 56.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228)
- Mercury 2: 46.6 (#157)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1331 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1249 | 1417 |
| LMArena Russian | 1201 | 1304 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1258 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183)
- Mercury 2: 70.2 (#165)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1222 | 1329 |
| IFEval | 89% | — |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213)
- Mercury 2: 40.5 (#154)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1242 | 1330 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227)
- Mercury 2: 53.8 (#155)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1241 | 1355 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1211 | 1289 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1242 | 1358 |
| WildBench | 73.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.0 H Small better than Mercury 2?

Mercury 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 4.0 H Small or Mercury 2 better for coding?

Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 33.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 H Small and Mercury 2 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 H Small has 19 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2 has 17.