# Hy4 preview vs Trinity Large Thinking

> Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.6 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index. Trinity Large Thinking costs 3.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/hy4-preview-vs-trinity-large-thinking
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy4 preview scores higher in 3 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 54.5 to 34.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 68.2% for Hy4 preview and 16.5% for Trinity Large Thinking.
- Trinity Large Thinking is cheaper at $0.25 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $0.83 / $2.50 for Hy4 preview.
- Hy4 preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.

## Snapshot

| | Hy4 preview | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 44.6 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 73 | 180 |
| Context | 1.05M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.83 | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Hy4 preview: 51.4 (#36)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 33.8 (#238)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1633 | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1381 |

## Reasoning

- Hy4 preview: 30.6 (#75)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 16.3 (#298)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 68.2% | 16.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1350 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |

## Math

- Hy4 preview: 54.5 (#37)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 34.9 (#149)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 75% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1366 |

## Knowledge

- Hy4 preview: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 40.3 (#107)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1359 |

## Multilingual

- Hy4 preview: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 46.4 (#155)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1372 |
| LMArena French | — | 1374 |
| LMArena German | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1312 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1338 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1356 |

## Instruction Following

- Hy4 preview: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 70.7 (#157)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1334 |

## Long Context

- Hy4 preview: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 41.2 (#139)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1355 |

## Writing & Preference

- Hy4 preview: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 54.0 (#152)

| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1321 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1342 |

## FAQ

### Is Hy4 preview better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.6 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index. Trinity Large Thinking costs 3.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Hy4 preview or Trinity Large Thinking?

Trinity Large Thinking is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview lists at $0.83 and $2.50.

### Is Hy4 preview or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?

Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.4 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Hy4 preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Hy4 preview and Trinity Large Thinking share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy4 preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.